[zach]

Thank you so much for the correction.

I had somehow read only the part about the sequence of food reintroduction having no association but missed the conclusion from that, which now of course seems obvious.

That really is something different. I'm surprised that this lede was buried in the articles on this result I've read. So the mystery continues. Very curious.

[gregburek]

That conclusion was really buried in there. Some form of confirmation bias on the part of a reader, perhaps?