[boo_boo]

You're out of touch with the reality for a large chunk of workers if you believe it's simple or even advisable for them to "just quit". We should be making the case for better conditions across the board, and this means not leaving it up to those in shitty situations to figure it out for themselves.

[_curious_]

Who said it was simple?

But advisable, sure if you or anyone is not uncomfortable with what they are being subject to/asked to do as part of a job, YES, I would advise them to quit if deemed necessary.

Would you advise them to stay and subject themselves to they type of treatment they did not agree with?

[boo_boo]

Would you advise them to leave and risk not being able to put food on the table if they can't find another position? If there's little to no opportunity for lateral movement in their job market right now?

[_curious_]

I would advise them to do what they felt was in their net best interest. Either way, they are making a conscious choice - a choice to stay and continue subjecting themselves to such treatment or a choice to leave and assume the risk.

Again, would you advise them to stay and subject themselves to they type of treatment they did not agree with?

[Avicebron]

By this time I can't tell if you're deliberately misunderstanding reality to virtue signal some sort of privilege?

But I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Vulnerable populations can have their employment opportunities gamed by powerful groups where they are essentially enslaved by their reliance on their paycheck to support their family, food, housing, etc. I don't understand why this doesn't register with you.