|
|
|
|
|
|
by free_rms
2230 days ago
|
|
|
Pike's take is pretty unfair to C++11, given how ideas like 'rvalue references' held up REALLY well. Yes, they were introducing even more complexity to a complex language, but how else are they supposed to incorporate better ways of doing things while maintaining backwards compatibility? I suppose one could always just build a new language that doesn't have the historical cruft, but in this case that's Rust and not Go. |
|
|