Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by saiya-jin 2234 days ago
'Tend to' doesn't mean some conscious, directed effort. On large enough scale, this is generally the more probable direction, and that's about it. Its truly random by nature.

It can very well go the other way as with 1918 'spanish' flu. Or it can change in ways that won't affect overall mortality much.

2 comments

It's interesting you should mention the 1918 flu. That one had two waves, the first one less lethal... Evolution is random, add you say, but that's not quite what happened.

It was in the middle of world war 1. Soldiers were infected, and the ones that became the most ill were sent home to recuperate, or die. Either way they spread the virus better than the ones who weren't as ill, and who stayed in the field.

So the usual evolutionary pressure was upside down here.

> On large enough scale, this is generally the more probable direction, and that's about it. Its truly random by nature.

If it's truly random it wouldn't be directional, yeah?

The genetic mutations are random, the survival of a lineage based on pressures and fitness can be "directional" by the human definition.