[btashton]

These are substantially more powerful than both of those families.

[ATsch]

Also substantially more expensive, especially compared to the likes of the banana pi zero, which gets you four cores at 1.2Ghz, 512MB RAM, Linux and a GPU for 35% cheaper. Pair that with a Blue Pill STM32 for $3 if you need realtime and you still have money left over.

[subhobroto]

That looks like a great stack!

In the "Pi" family, for a Linux SBC, which pi/clone gives a good bang for the buck?

banana pi zero has shown up multiple times but since you are in the know, I wanted to ask what's a good SBC to run OpenWRT on, for example

[subhobroto]

> Blue Pill STM32 for $3

The Black Pill STM32 for $4 are an ever better value!

[clarry]

https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/microcontrolle...

[btashton]

What is your point? This is more powerful than all of the ones on your linked page.

[duskwuff]

Marginally. The STM32H7 series offers Cortex-M7 cores at up to 480 MHz, with a Cortex-M4 coprocessor on some parts at 240 MHz. It's not quite as fast as the i.MXRT1052, but it's damn close.

[clarry]

The posted coremark scores do not support your claim that NXP iMXRT1062 is substantially more powerful. If I take these numbers at face value, then STM32 promises up to 45% more perf.