|
|
|
|
|
|
by hombre_fatal
2235 days ago
|
|
|
I don't think the cost of losing things is as high as you imagine. You can use X until it fails and then you can use Y. I also don't think your doomsday scenario makes much sense either. What do you mean "lifted their hands" and why would it happen out of the blue with zero warning? Though I'll repeat: so what? I don't think a decentralized system is much better in this regard. It just means things rot at a more staggered pace. Service A shuts down on year 0, service B shuts down on year 10, etc. It's just a different trade-off, not the panacea we like to pretend it is. |
|
|