| > You just called a group of people haters because they didn't support your ideals. No they are haters because they are spreading FUD about Ext.js with no true or substantial points to support their claims. > What does commercial-grade mean to you? How many users does that mean? How many tested platforms? ONE of our apps has > 300k users. No major bugs or usability issues on production. And is tested on every browser with over 5% usage share (too many to list, the info is on the net anyway) on all the major platforms (Win, Lin, OSX). > Microsoft and Google uses jQuery and not ExtJS This is laughable. Microsoft and Google use jQuery for web pages. Not applications. Looks at Gmail and find jQuery there ??? > - other people may actually be good at writing their own stuff If they want to waste their time and be overtaken by the competition who are making better use of resources they are entitled to make that poor judgement. > - ExtJS may not save you from writing custom stuff, because you may need stuff that aren't included It takes less resources to extend Ext.js that is does to replicate it. > Can you support these claims or you just wrote them down to justify your ideals? Having worked on RIA for over 6 years and having had Ext.js apps in production since Ext.js 2 my experience is that both Ext.js and illuminations work well. I'm not going to write a review and give you cypto certificates to login to apps that are not public. Its an observation from experience. > You are obviously someone engaged in a trollish behavior for some reason. Spreading FUD about a framework that is completely false is trollish behavior. I did not do that. |
Does you claiming the opposite make your comment valuable?
> This is laughable. Microsoft and Google use jQuery for web pages. Not applications. Looks at Gmail and find jQuery there ???
Sorry, I can't take nobody seriously who uses meaningless buzzwords in this context. Your comment is laughable.
> If they want to waste their time and be overtaken by the competition who are making better use of resources they are entitled to make that poor judgement.
Again: poor assumption.
> It takes less resources to extend Ext.js that is does to replicate it.
What if the functionality inside Ext.js is not what you need? You can extend a hammer to make a tank, it's just not practical.
> Spreading FUD about a framework that is completely false is trollish behavior. I did not do that.
Your 1 day old account and your tone suggest otherwise.