|
|
|
|
|
by joshuaellinger
2236 days ago
|
|
On the smaller end of the scale, I have a $12K/mo spend with Azure. I decided to go back to Coloc. For under $50K, I have 4 machines with an aggregate 1TB RAM, 48 cores, 1 pricy GPU, 16TB of fast SSD, 40 TB HHD, and infiniband @ 56GB/sec. Rent on the cabinet is less than $1K/mo. It's going to cost me about $20K in labor to migrate. So the nominal break-even point is six months but the real kicker is that this is effectively x10-30 the raw power of what I was getting on the cloud. I can offer a quantitatively different set of calculations. It also simplifies a bunch of stuff:
1. No APIs to read blob data -- just good old files on an ZFS share.
2. No need to optimize memory consumption.
3. No need for docker/k8s/etc to spin up under load. Just have a cluster sitting there. There are downsides but Coloc beats the cloud for certain problems. |
|