Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jrrrr 2241 days ago
> GitGardener is at $151 MRR.

TIL people are willing to pay for fake GitHub activity.

3 comments

At first I tried to misunderstand the GitGardener website. But no, I think this is what it is.

Wow.

And Cyberleads sells emails lists (see my other comment). I don't think we should be condoning this guy's behavior..
Why not if employers look for it?
Because it's not particularly ethical? Doesn't seem less deceptive than lying on a CV to me.
But is it what the market wants, though? If customers are paying, then I think the answer is obvious.
you can also buy stolen credit card numbers on the darknet, the customers are paying.
But I don’t need it. If I really needed it, maybe I would buy it.
Sorry, are you saying that it's a good thing to sell stolen credit cards because there is a market for them?
Is forcing people to contribute on github ethical? Aside from only looking at one social coding platform vs [gitlab/azure/sourcehut/self-hosted], it takes the viewpoint that one writes and publishes code on github -on top of- their day job. Since not all companies put their private code on github.

What if I have a family? What if I have -any- other hobbies than just programming all day? What if I have other obligations or just want to -relax- after work?

I wouldn't pay for a service like this (I would write a simple script, can't be that hard), but I don't find it unethical either. You want to be lazy and just look at some numbers? Here are your numbers. I'd be willing to bet that it never comes up again once hired. Actually, I just wouldn't apply to a company that places that much weight on github contribution history. But if I had zero industry experience and was just trying to get any job, the situation might be different.

Of course, but it looks like a so politic. In modern world we have a "fake" life. We already happy on the internet. I didn't see sad post on social media.
Because the employer is looking for a signal of quality. This manufactures the signal without the quality. The fact that the signal is a flawed proxy for quality to begin with doesn't change that using this product is deliberately deceptive.