|
|
|
|
|
by dsfyu404ed
2238 days ago
|
|
>Not if you count rent / mortgage Depends where you live. There's no reason the 175k employee can't live somewhere "bad" or suffer a long commute. Most major western european cities and their suburbs are by no means cheap to find housing in. >car & car insurance Most white collar Europeans with families own cars. Owning and operating a vehicle is astronomically cheaper in the US, even in California which has insanely high costs compared to the median or mean state. >kindergarten Part of the free (at the point of use, obviously it's paid for by taxes) public school system in the US. >And you medical coverage might still cover less than the European one. I don't want to have a healthcare debate but the cost was addressed higher up the thread and the difference in coverage between what American BigCo employees get and what Europeans get (and both those classes of insurance are diverse enough to make comparison impractical without sweeping generalizations) is not going to be meaningful except in the edge cases. |
|
I don't think there are many "bad" places that are cheap around Silicon Valley.
Most western European cities have neighbourhoods that are drastically cheaper than the well-off ones.
> Most white collar Europeans with families own cars. Owning and operating a vehicle is astronomically cheaper in the US, even in California which has insanely high costs compared to the median or mean state.
New cars in America are twice as expensive as the average in the EU.
Average car insurance in America is five times as expensive as the average in the EU.
> Part of the free (at the point of use, obviously it's paid for by taxes) public school system in the US.
Sorry, I meant nursery.* Kindergarten is free in the EU as well.
> I don't want to have a healthcare debate but the cost was addressed higher up the thread and the difference in coverage between what American BigCo employees get and what Europeans get (and both those classes of insurance are diverse enough to make comparison impractical without sweeping generalizations) is not going to be meaningful except in the edge cases.
Well that's convenient. Based on the American medical debt lets go with a lesser coverage for the American workforce. Also it's not taking into account the cost of opportunity of having medical insurance event when you won't be employed anymore in case of an accident or other reason.