|
|
|
|
|
by ADefenestrator
2235 days ago
|
|
Disclaimer - Backblaze employee here, but just speaking for myself: It was.. sort of cheaper. They didn't actually build the servers, and as described the server wouldn't work (onboard SATA didn't support port multipliers, lack of ECC would probably cause problems in practice, bit hand-wavey on power/space/network/manpower costs, etc). The goal of the article was to get other people to build cheap storage and put it up for rent on their network. They do have some amount of storage space available for very cheap on the network now, but personally I suspect it's people who figured "what the heck, I'll give it a try!" as opposed to people actually building storage servers and making a profit renting them out. I was honestly pretty disappointed - I'd hoped they'd found a cheap motherboard with ECC and support for port multipliers, but nope. |
|
Edit: The motherboard they picked does support ECC memory, anyway. In general ASRock models do.