|
|
|
|
|
by mopsi
2242 days ago
|
|
But it's rarely informed. The US has very outdated, insecure and absurdly expensive retail banking and most people seem to be completely oblivious to it, which is why they fail to the potential of settlement systems like Ripple. Financial transactions are just small pieces of information, no different than funny GIFs or instant messages. It costs virtually nothing to move them around instantaneously across the globe in a secure way, and yet here we are, discussing if that has any value over snail-mail type of experience. Europe stands out somewhat and we can argue that cryptocurrencies don't bring much improvement onto the table. Banking fees are already very low and Europe is currently rolling out instant credit transfer. I can open a bank account for free and without any recurring fees, and make up to 5000 payments a month for free to anyone in Europe, arriving in less than 20 seconds, available 24/7/365, automatable through APIs. But the rest of the world... my God what stone age you're living in, people with paper checks and overdraft fees imagine they're "informed skeptics" against modern settlement systems. Feels like early 1990s with people saying that email is pointless and they'll never use it. |
|
Whatever the solution we end up with, it won't be decentralized. No one wants to lose their money because they lost some token or paper, and their computer broke.
It will be great new distributed world -- but it would also be licensed, insured, centrally approved, KYC'd, and free of chinese cryptominers and people stealing your passport numbers.