Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bsanr2 2235 days ago
>the premiums would go up because it's no longer a group policy, and I would have to pay for it with post-tax income.

But there would be no premiums.

2 comments

maybe I'm arguing against a strawman, but the first paragraph is addressing the situation where insurance is decoupled from my employer, but nothing else changes (ie, I select and pay for a private insurance policy). all this does is delete a tax exemption and group bargaining leverage. maybe I was supposed to understand from context that this isn't what "decoupling" means?
Someone has to pay for it.