Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rezoner 2242 days ago
Quality pixelart is more expensive than 3D assets. You get all angles and bone based animation from a model while you have to draw every animation frame in every angle manually with 2D approach. On top of that a 3D world brings easier customisation and reusability of assets.
2 comments

OTOH with 3D you have to do a lot of work setting up bones, textures, blend shapes, and whatnot.
Is quality pixel art more expensive than quality 3D assets? I really don't think so.
Poor quality 3D assets still work OK. Poor quality pixel art is very ugly. So if you can only afford poor quality, 3D is much better.