But in this case I think the case history points to OP being right, though you'd likely have to have a pretty egregious and clear pattern of such activity, and it would have to be deemed material information:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sec-capitalone-insidertra...
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/file/765216/download
https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/file/765216/download