| > This claim on the Wikipedia is factually incorrect: "This data is tied to a unique identifier allowing Cliqz to track long-term performance." That claim comes directly from Mozilla's support page on the subject¹: > Firefox shares the following data with Cliqz to provide functionality and improve performance of the Cliqz feature for everyone: > - Search queries & webpage data: This includes text as you type in the address bar, queries you send to certain search engines, and data about the webpages you visit and interactions with those pages, such as mouse movements, scrolls, and time spent. > - Interaction data: This includes your interactions with specific fields and buttons in the Cliqz feature. This data is tied to a unique identifier allowing Cliqz to understand performance over time. So, if that's "factually incorrect", you should take it up with your business partners. > There are plenty of papers on the topic, independent audits, the code is open-source and the data can be inspected. HumanWeb data is 100% record-unlikable, we have no way to know if two messages received come from the same person or not. For now. Things can always change, and promises can always be broken. It'd be a lot easier to trust Cliqz if it wasn't collecting such data at all, let alone sending it to remote servers with a pinky promise that it's anonymized. ---- ¹: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/cliqz-recommendations-f... |