[erinaceousjones]

I suppose it depends on what your intentions are:

* "I want to run my stuff from home indefinitely, in the background": Don't use kubernetes. You'll spend ages setting up your cluster, you'll be fighting to keep it up. Most things you'll want to run probably have an OS package and run happily as systemd services. It's unnecessary overhead, both on the hardware, and mentally. Internal certificates [used to, at least] expire after a year on kubeadm created clusters, so if you don't look at it occasionally your control plane goes down. It doesn't handle the case where all your machines are nearly at full capacity (i.e. >85% disk, or nearly all memory used) and the defaults are to kick things off nodes with "pressure" which is a huge PITA when you don't have a dynamically scalable cluster - nothing makes my blood boil than seeing 200 lines of "Evicted" in kubectl . It's designed for huge workloads in datacentres, after all. You really don't need it for hosting a single user blog and a NAS.

* "I want to set up a homelab and learn k8s": Definitely use kubernetes. You'll learn how painful and time-consuming it is to manage onprem installs, but you'll also learn a lot. A lot of packaged kubernetes solutions follow the same patterns (ingress controllers like nginx / ambassador / envoy, istio service mesh, flannel etc for VLANs, prometheus for monitoring, helm / argocd deployments, ...) so it's super useful if you need to use kubernetes at work. You'll come to realize just how much awful, awful stupid rolling-release "this was deprecated on Tuesday and all our config schemas have changed" bullshit you're protected from when using someone else's (i.e. BigCorp's cloud solution) managed kubernetes cloud thing, and screaming "NO" at anyone who starts to utter "on-prem" will become ingrained in you.

:-)