[strogonoff]

> How would you sell me on Pantry vs. AWS S3?

Is this question really appropriate? The developer is sharing a pro bono offering, where does selling anyone on it against a commercial service even come into play?

It looks like a project that must have been fun to make and could be useful for storing non-sensitive data with very little hassle. Long bucket IDs appear to leave little chance for name collision.

If you are building a piece of software that deals with anything remotely like PII or has specific availability requirements, I sincerely hope this is not something you are seriously considering (otherwise, pardon me, I hope I won’t be your user or customer), starting from the fact that you aren’t paying for it and there is no SLA.

[marktangotango]

Of course it’s appropriate! From the docs this service doesn’t even meet the “viable” part of MVP! Ok a user can post some json that’s public (no authentication) and doesn’t even work across domains (CORS).

Suppose adding those things and targeting “mobile backend as a service” or even more general “backend as service” there is still a lot to be desired. Like static html, ok you’re competition is Firebase.

How’s Firebase doing these days?

[fiveSpeedManual]

Thanks for the kind words and for understanding where I'm coming from, and my perspective :)

[pmiller2]

"Sell me on X vs. Y." is a colloquialism. It's just a different way of asking "what are the benefits of X over Y."

[strogonoff]

We’re talking welcoming a stranger sharing the result of their work with “but what are the benefits of your free solution over megacorp Z’s paid offering Y?”.

[whalesalad]

That is your interpretation but not my meaning.