Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by e12e 2248 days ago
I get that they're busy, and "lol, you're on an ancient version #wontfix" is quite all right as a first response (maybe a little less so for RedHat subscribers, considering the link between systemd and RedHat).

But not seing that the design seems fundamentally broken, that's more of an issue (message amplification to millions of messages, the fact that it's questionable if systemd even can use the information for meaningful ordering/dependency reseloution.... When it's not systemd doing the mounting..).