Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ceejayoz 2244 days ago
The article states the White House recommended the vendor to New York.
2 comments

With New York's view on the white house and their capabilities - not doing due diligence is on them.
And with the position of authority the federal government is in, giving poor recommendations is on them. Responsibility goes both ways.
Sure - we know the whitehouse is incompetent - we've known that since day one.
I get that as chief executive, the president is ultimately responsible for everything, but is this literally where we're dumping the blame?

The President failed to make sure the task force member who recommended the vendor had done his diligence and the state government was just 100% blindly trusting of the very same White House they claim to hate at every step of the way, therefore it's Trump's fault?

What ever happened to trust but verify?

I just don't understand why type of micro-manager would be needed for this to not be his fault then. It wouldn't be a human at that point, you'd need some sort of AI that manages the smallest of minutia of every aspect of government.

> claim to hate

Please don't fall prey to the emo journalism of the day. And don't rachet it up even farther. For the most part, these are professionals doing their jobs. There's been a lot more failure than typical, on both sides, in the face of an historical pandemic. But let's not demonize either side here, or assume that others do.

For the record, Trump does run the executive branch, and if one of its people pushed this through, it reflects horribly on his leadership and whoever eventually gets thrown under the bus.

But, this article doesn't bring much to the table in terms of sources. Doesn't make sense to point fingers until someone involved in the purchase does, without anonymity.