Why is it not stupid? If disconnections are part of normal application flow then why would you use an exception?
You are correct, I was somewhat disingenuous with _slightly_ faster. It is lots faster but lots faster in error cases, which from a philosophical angle is still absurd.
As long as you use your exceptions for "bad shit" (uncommon error conditions or completely unexpected failures or returns) then I still strongly believe that the performance comparison is silly.
Maybe I'm missing something. Are you saying that in your application, handling rarely-occuring unanticipated disconnections via exceptions has such high overhead that its results in unacceptable performance?
You are correct, I was somewhat disingenuous with _slightly_ faster. It is lots faster but lots faster in error cases, which from a philosophical angle is still absurd.
As long as you use your exceptions for "bad shit" (uncommon error conditions or completely unexpected failures or returns) then I still strongly believe that the performance comparison is silly.