| Huh. That's not the response I expected. You're not arguing with the Spectator, they're just acting as a publisher. You're arguing with in his words, "a recently-retired Professor of Pathology and NHS consultant pathologist". So you're claiming a professional British pathologist doesn't understand how British death certificates work, and you know better. Bold move. Especially so because you seem to actually be agreeing with what he wrote, which is weird. For instance your claim (3) exactly matches his claim that: "the vast majority of respiratory deaths in the UK are recorded as bronchopneumonia, pneumonia, old age or a similar designation. We don’t really test for flu, or other seasonal infections." You say flu appears on many death certificates. Yes and he never argued otherwise. He said despite that it's sometimes mentioned it's actually under-reported because testing isn't really done much for it - as you agreed with! That leaves the question of notifiability. The rules say that COVID-19 must be mentioned on a death certificate if testing was done at all, even if negative (which is new to me, I wonder what that does to the widely cited stat of "number of certificates that mention COVID"). But the point is that relative to flu, testing deaths for COVID is enormous, practically blanket at this point. If you test a lot and you insist that every case is reported to central government it will cause a flood of reports to arrive on the desks of decision makers, who will then feel it's much worse than flu. But it's not, it's just a reporting artifact. |