Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xlc0212 2240 days ago
I have many personal files and wanting make sure they are accessible for rest of my life. Please tell me a platform that can provide this solution and why I can trust it?
3 comments

Depending on the size of your files, burn a burn of duplicate DVDs or BDs. They have the longest lifetime in cold storage tradeoff vs equipment/money investment. Period. Store those disks in a fireproof bag or box and they're pretty much there for a lifetime.
Yeah, just make sure the DVDs or BDs you buy have HTL (i.e. use inorganic dye).
This is definitely true, most cheaper discs degrade after a few years.

The issue you're forgetting to mention is the fact that physical DVD drives won't be around for more than a few more years, you then need to make sure you have one in working order on a system that can use it

Aws s3
For people who don't pay too much attention to storage: AWS S3 is a technical wonder, bringing down the price of storage to practically unbeatable levels. It's really a jewel in the crown of the AWS service portfolio. In terms of the amount you get metered down to the penny, it may be the single most impressive thing on AWS, honestly.

If it costs me $1 to store my stuff per month on S3, and you reduce that... so what? It's so cheap it's not going to help my wallet much. This isn't like going from $100 to $2- or even $50 to $20. It's going from like $10/year to... I dunno, $4. I might as well stay on AWS.

That leaves the enterprise market, which, naturally, loves S3 100x more than the random individual, because S3 is a solid enterprise choice, and will always have the enterprise advantage, by a crushing margin.

AWS is itself hard to compete with, but of all the services you could compete with on AWS, S3 is probably the worst. So you're going up against the worst of the worst, here. I can't say it's impossible, but it's like an extra double hard market to compete in, in an already tough market.

You may be able to store 1 TB in S3 deep glacier for $1 per month, but it will cost you $90 in bandwidth to do a restore.

I recently had a RAID array rebuild fail and had to restore 10 TB from cloud backups. That would've cost me $900 on S3.

why should i believe it is still going to offer my service after 30 years?
Why should I believe IPFS will still be running in 30 years?
Because it is a decentralized protocol - like email
Have you ever tried downloading an old torrent, typically lacking persistent seeders?
just because something exists in some form today and is decentralized doesn't mean it will stand the test of time. the internet is a graveyard of abandoned and failed projects and protocols.
https://arweave.org

Arweave has developed a new type of blockchain based on Moore’s Law of the declining cost of data storage. Users pay upfront (one time payment) for a hundred years of storage at less than a cent per megabyte, and the interest that accrues will cover the dwindling storage cost forever. More than one million pieces of data are now stored on the permaweb...

Source: https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/05/coronavirus-censorship-arw...