Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by twic 2251 days ago
There are perhaps two parts to an apology. One is an acknowledgement that you did something wrong, and that you should not have done it. The other is a sort of ritualistic, performative (in the original sense!) use of language that may make someone feel better. This is the difference between:

"I made a mistake when i dereferenced that null pointer"

and:

"I'm sorry i dereferenced that null pointer"

I absolutely agree with you that the ritualistic part is pointless, and perhaps harmful if it is performed instead of actually fixing the problem (see also "thoughts and prayers").

But i wouldn't want to stop doing the acknowledgement part.

1 comments

I wouldn’t refer to the first stage as an apology, it is simply an acknowledgement.

I very rarely apologize for a bug at work. I don’t expect others to apologize to me either. Apologies should be reserved for personal/relationship things, like forgetting to invite somebody to a meeting.