|
|
|
|
|
by taeric
2242 days ago
|
|
This is making a lot of assumptions on what the at risk crowd is. Now, I confess I am also making assumptions there. Data would be nice. My assumptions are we could have saved a sizeable portion by tighter lockdowns on nursing homes. I also suspect we could have done things pre-infection to strengthen lungs of people with pre-existing lung conditions. More pointedly, I think all of the havoc we have caused by closing schools is likely not amounting to a lot of saved lives. As a risk group, children are basically not at risk of severe cases. Now, I hasten to add that no policy should be set by some random internet poster. I am hoping we are collecting data and running simulations to give us better data for the future. |
|
Children aren't at risk, and that's not why schools were closed.
Your posts don't seem to be made in good faith. Either that or you are demonstrating a lack of information on par with Trump.