Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tomp 2245 days ago
But surely the prudent, cautious way of wording a non-denial would be "no clear evidence of the impossibility of human-to-human transmission"?
1 comments

And how do you go about testing that hypothesis except for placing infected people next to uninfected people and watching for them to become infected?

Their phrasing is correct and so is their methodology.