|
|
|
|
|
by f38zf5vdt
2244 days ago
|
|
The author seems to ignore the obvious confounding factor here of selection bias -- super spreader events all seem to deal with people who are in the same social circles rather than outside them, as would be the case in public transportation, movie theaters, gyms, etc. The reason being that events with people in social socials are readily traceable to an infected individual attending, whereas contact tracing for anonymous infection in a shared area is much more difficult. Even diseases with low transmissibility are known to be disseminated by public transit, such as tuberculosis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338233/ |
|
> I am not an epidemiologist, let alone a virologist. And the data I am working with is substandard anyway, as there are all sorts of obvious selection biases at play, including the editorial biases of the journalists on whom I rely for local reports.