Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by seanwilson 2247 days ago
> How flexible is Hugo? And how many plugins does someone generally use?

It processes Markdown, JSON, YAML and SASS, can pull in data files from URLs, and has custom templates/themes, custom macros/shortcuts, image processing and live reload. It doesn't have a plugin system as far as I know but nothing stops you combining Hugo with other tools e.g. run a JS script to pull in and transform a JSON file before Hugo runs.
1 comments
turnipla 2247 days ago
I think that’s the point. No plugin system. Compare Babel to Bublé or even Sucrase for example: https://github.com/alangpierce/sucrase

Preparing data for external use always takes extra effort.

You can build an efficient self-contained tool in JavaScript too.

link
ratww 2247 days ago
A counterpoint: Babel's extensibility doesn't matter in practice at all, other than helping the Babel team organize their code.

Pretty much every new ES6 feature required parser and babel-core changes just to be able to be used.

Example: a lot of changes that only worked in Babel 7 (that was on Beta for months) were not possible in Babel 6, and so on for previous versions. A plugin was not enough: you also needed parser/core changes.

Other than for novel non-standard features (like code substitution), plugins are not exactly that powerful, and even things like that are frowned upon in most environments, as 99.9% of people just want ES6 features.

link
seanwilson 2246 days ago
> Preparing data for external use always takes extra effort.

How much effort are you really talking about for a static site though? Can you be specific?

Most sites I've worked on are processing a modest number of Markdown + JSON files, where sometimes these are pulled in from an external URL. Why does any of this require anything particularly complicated or anything that could justify a big performance hit?

> You can build an efficient self-contained tool in JavaScript too.

Does one exist for static site generators though?

link