|
|
|
|
|
by arcticbull
2250 days ago
|
|
That likely has to do with availability of tests, who's getting tested, where and when. With Sweden not attempting to stop the spread, I doubt they've done wide-spread population testing. They're likely limiting it to hospitals, so the fact it's flat its really what matters until they kick off their wide-spread serological study in the works. [edit] I misread, disregard, but preserving for posterity. |
|
Now, 11/100 blood givers in Stockholm who has not been sick in the last two weeks have antibodies according to researchers.
That gives you a naive mortality rate of 0,4% per infection, assuming the spread among bloodgivers is the same as the population in general and just dividing the death count by 11% of the population. It is a high eastimate as I guess many wont get traceable antobodies and mostly asymptotic people give blood.
[1] (Swedish) https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/publicerat-material/publ...