[wayneftw]

> You are arguing for the sake of arguing.

Nope. I actually just disagreed with you. I think JS is a robust language and I said why very clearly and politely.

You, however - well I stopped reading after your first sentence.

Good luck to you!

[brabel]

You start with " You should check your definition." and you think that is " actually just disagreed with you. I think JS is a robust language and I said why very clearly and politely."?

You didn't say why JS is robust, you twisted the word's definition to fit your point. Don't do that.

If your way of debating is to leave the debate when someone says something you don't like, then good luck working in IT.