|
|
|
|
|
by robenkleene
2255 days ago
|
|
Love to hear any more commentary about the pros and cons of this approach? I assume the main reasoning is that it’s easier to make a link? The nice thing about the `[File](file.md)` method is that it’s markdown native, e.g., you can follow them in GitHub, if you have a way to render file URLs HTML, you’re links will just work in the browser too, and many txt editors can follow them by default. |
|
Also, Github uses Gollum, which actually supports wiki style links anyway.
If you are maintaining a knowledge base, it gets really tedious to do that, if 99% of your links are just going to have the same caption as your filename. So being able to make links as quickly as possible facilitates efficiency. Besides, there are alternative syntaxes for being able to specific a custom caption for a wiki-style link.
Another thing to consider, is that in most mediums that I use my knowledge bases in, they are not styling my links anyway. I can still of course follow them automatically, but they are just presenting them as [[Links]]. Most people prefer that.
My different wikis have gone through many different iterations, and most of these engines are fairly compatible-ish with each other. They are similar enough that any migration required could be done with a few lines of Perl on my set of md files.