I never said that. The alternative isn't no lock of course. It's the free lock that's equally safe to the one with the green "this is safe" sticker that you pay a premium for.
There most certainly was a reason, just not your reason (circumvention). Read the page you linked to. It literally says "users did not notice it", "users do not notice their absence", "users do not react as intended to positive or neutral security UI". It was user-focused. Not attacker-focused.
But I do agree it's pointless to keep continuing this.