[vladislav]

This demo is not informative as to the readiness for scalable L4 deployment, for which it would be necessary to focus on the breadth/accuracy of perception features under the hood of intent prediction and what happens at the tail end with arbitrary situations that occur in urban driving environments.

[anonymous_car]

    This demo is not informative as to the readiness for scalable L4 deployment

does anyone make that claim?

[vladislav]

Presenting a subset of the information to let the uninformed jump to favorable conclusions for the presenter is not a new marketing strategy. If there's no indication about the true level of progress, what is the purpose of the demo?

[chrisseaton]

> to let the uninformed

The uniformed don't know what 'scalable L4 deployment' is, so they can't jump to that conclusion.

[yellowapple]

No, but they're familiar with the definition (start-to-finish entirely autonomous trip under somewhat-controlled driving conditions) even if they don't necessarily know the lingo to describe it. Being able to get from point A to point B without human intervention is what people expect when they hear "self-driving car", and the video does little (if anything) to temper that expectation (perhaps because it truly is ready for L4 deployment, or perhaps because it's all smoke and mirrors).

[chrisseaton]

> under somewhat-controlled driving conditions

I don't even know what this means, so I doubt the uninformed know the definition.

[yellowapple]

Meaning one can see the road, chiefly.