[ganstyles]

I don't know that I agree with this first statement, but even if I do, everything is abstracted by import statements even outside ML. You say this is a huge amount of code abstracted, but it wouldn't be difficult to reimplement this in numpy and pandas directly without using tensorflow at all. The code would expand a bit, and you'd have to deal directly with backprop and calculating derivatives but it wouldn't expand things too much. But then you could make the same claim about numpy abstracting the linear algebra, and I could show you that I could extract that and do it without numpy but then it would be the python math library. It's turtles all the way down. My point is, your comment applies to everything.

[covidacct]

Yup, I absolutely agree. Almost all big leaps in software engineering and applied computer science come from building a powerful and simple abstraction. Powerful and simple abstractions are surprisingly difficult to get right.

[gowld]

When people say "little code" what they mean an should say is "little customization of the tool".

There's also the issue of how hard it is to select the line of code (API call) that does the job (because the API surface is huge), which is nearly invisible attribute.

Mathematica is famous for being incredibly powerful with low custom coding, but also very hard to find the API call that does the precise thing you need.