|
|
|
|
|
by sailfast
2254 days ago
|
|
First off - I don't know that it's normal for a competing company in a protest to post a press release like this. I know things have gotten nuts recently and people protest for giggles these days, but this seems... weird. I also wonder to a certain extent why additional ceiling was not added under the current vehicle to do this if AWS was the preferred solution. MOUs signed, dollars routed, etc seems to be the easiest route rather than a massive procurement for something like this. It doesn't make any sense unless they're awarding an entirely new data center. It also sounds like there's a disagreement about a core requirement / availability definitions which significantly impact storage costs, which obviously would change one's bid?
https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252480585/AWS-hits-out-a... DoD IG Report on the process:
https://www.scribd.com/document/456555063/Report-on-the-Join... |
|