|
|
|
|
|
by danpalmer
2250 days ago
|
|
This means then that if you run multiple application servers, which most do, that you’ll need to implement a data distribution mechanism of some sort. I must admit, with limitations like this I’m struggling to figure out the use cases for this. Edit: so I guess this is easier using the change subscriptions you mention in other comments. That does mean many subscribers, but hopefully that’s minimal load. This has the trade-off that it’s now eventually consistent, but I suppose that’s not a problem for many high read applications. I’m still feeling like this could be solved in a simpler way with just simple data structures and a pub sub mechanism. Now I think of it, we do a similar thing with Redis for one service, and a custom Python server/pipeline in another, but we’ve never felt the need for this sort of thing. Do you have more details about specific applications/use cases, and why this is better than alternatives? |
|