[Threeve303]

While I agree with you, I'll play devils advocate: The information in the documents is so bad, the damage it would cause would be worse than 9/11 itself.

What other logical reason is there for keeping it secret for this long?

[dvtrn]

Okay, damage to whom? The American people or individuals with compromised interests? I am unconvinced it's not the latter and that's a shame akin to the reality that we have to find of squaring with that it took a comedian pleading with tears in his eyes to convince Congress to do the right thing and even authorize funds for first responder's families.

Next question: More damaging than 9/11? Does that preclude the loss of life the morning of? To say nothing of the lives lost during the resulting military actions and regional fallout?

Let me end this by asking this: does this of all things really need a devil's advocate? The devil seems to be doing just fine pro se.

[baybal2]

There happen to be one major Saudi company that happen to be a privileged accessory to their monarch...

https://s.france24.com/media/display/aa00e3a4-0eb0-11e9-818f...

Basically yes, USA has went to absolutely unexplainable, completely bizarre extent to shield Saudis from the fallout, and even took out their biggest enemy in the region for them.

A document rendering multiple US administrations complete insert expletive will be deeply detrimental to political careers of many political clans on the hill.

[pan69]

But that's what OP is asking/saying right? If the information was made public it would mean that heads would role (proably even prosecutions) but the nation would be just fine (other than that lots of people might have to get to terms that their government has been lying to them for decades).

[dvtrn]

I read their response as more of a "yes, and" versus a "no but".

[spamizbad]

This information would probably make it politically impossible to maintain peaceful, diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia. That’s probably why.

[dvtrn]

If peace and diplomacy are the goals, conducting it in the dark terrifies me as to what steps the interested parties aim to use in 'getting there' or the questionable trades and concessions they make outside of the spotlight.

I mean let’s turn this on its head: if peace and diplomacy are the goals, what do they have to hide? That’s a pretty universal outcome that I can’t imagine many people having a problem pursuing.

Can we stop treating the devil like an indigent defendant now and look this diseased horse square in the mouth? This is kabooky-simulacra-governance disguised as security policy.

[baybal2]

Yes, you are very correct. Interested people can google "Operation CONDOR"

[dillonmckay]

Why does the US need to maintain peaceful, diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia?

[mirimir]

The Saudis no longer control enough oil to explain it.

But maybe it's all connected to Epstein, or rather to the group that he ostensibly headed. That would account for the links to both Israel and Saudi Arabia. And there's the possibly that they're blackmailing many senior politicians from the US and who knows how many other countries.[0]

0) https://medium.com/@dylanhoward/russia-israel-and-saudi-arab...

[baybal2]

It doesn't, but if it is uncovered that it isn't, people will have to ask their politicians why they keep spending billions on Saudis is there is no terrible secret reason to do so.

[int_19h]

If that is the case, then some action carried out by Saudi Arabia already makes it ethically impossible to maintain peaceful, diplomatic relations.

[catalogia]

All the more reason for it to be made public. We all deserve to know the truth.

[fiblye]

If there’s any damaging or damning info, the people should hear it and decide how to respond. If the truth has been told to us already, then nothing could be that much more damaging. If we were deceived from the beginning, then that has already resulted in massive amounts of damage.

The only people who would lose are those within political organizations.