[ATsch]

Well, your ByteBuf is still a pointer. You also now need to dereference it to get the length. It also can't be passed by value, since it's very big. You can also not have multiple ByteBufs pointing at subsections of the same region of memory.

Thing is, you rarely want to share just a buffer anyway. You probably have additional state, locks, etc. So what I do is embed my ByteBuf directly into another structure, which then owns it completely:

    typedef struct {
        ...
        ByteBuf mybuffer;
        ...
    } SomeThing;

So we end up with the same amount of pointers (1), but with some unique advantages.

[kkdwivedi]

Right, totally depends on what you're doing. My example is not a good fit for intrusive use cases.

[saagarjha]

sizeof(ByteBuf) == sizeof(size_t), and you can pass it by value; I just don't think you can do anything useful with it because it'll chop off the data.