That's fair. I guess I meant more "the frontier of academic AI", but then again I don't really keep up with academic AI at all, so I might just be wrong about what academic AI is. I can't really make any strong claims about academia.
My stronger claim is that this falls so squarely within the bounds of "game AI" that it's fairly ludicrous to say it's not AI.
Such a wrong take. Decision trees are nothing more than if statements. Fancier versions of those (random forests) are consistently near SOTA algorithms like neural networks (and beat them on tabular datasets frequently). AI can be just a shit ton of if/else statements.
My stronger claim is that this falls so squarely within the bounds of "game AI" that it's fairly ludicrous to say it's not AI.