|
|
|
|
|
by perl4ever
2252 days ago
|
|
You (and others, I know you're not alone) take a tone ("outsized") as if this is a distortion or problem that somehow needs to be fixed. The people who hedge, were doing so because they need time to adjust their supply to demand. This is a fact of reality, and hedging is the tool that allows producers to purchase insurance against sudden changes they couldn't otherwise deal with. Mexico or whoever, paid for their hedges, so on net it isn't some special advantage they have. It's not about preventing adjustment to demand, but about having the producers who more easily can, do so instead. |
|
Also, It doesn't matter if their hedge costs as much as what it earns them over the years, the advantage they have right now is still real. And while yes, hedging is a common form of insurance in the oil industry, I don't know of any other oil producing state that hedges so much of their production.
So what I meant in my comment is that the revenue stability they have right now but other oil producers don't gives them an outsized negotiating power versus a country like for example Angola, that really cannot afford to not cut production if the Saudis demand it.