|
|
|
|
|
by WalterBright
2256 days ago
|
|
> frankly I don't see any argument for less than proportional representation that isn't predicated on the notion that some people are more equal than others Consider two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner. That's why the Senate exists. |
|
The senate doesn't exist to protect the will of sheep at the hands of wolves. It exists because 250 years ago, the edit: New Jersey delegation wasn't willing to relinquish its equal power at the Constitutional Convention to a state like Virginia. Its never been about sheep and wolves, it's been about the political power of a political class that sought to concentrate as much of it as possible for themselves at the expense of others.
If you want a better way to look at it, it's a dozen wolves convincing a dozen sheep that the wolves should have twice the voting power on dinner because they have a bigger grazing area.