Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by alxlaz 2260 days ago
> - dense UI (less whitespace meant more information packed into a smaller window that took up less of my screen)

Yesterday's thread about DECUS and HP's OpenVMS hobbyist program opened a can of nostalgia worms so I remembered that my first laptop was a late-Digital era 11"-screen laptop with a pretty low-res screen (800x600, I think?).

I used ICQ on it and its interface was about as awkward as Skype's is today -- except today I'm running Skype on a laptop with about twice the screen estate. It's a little silly that all that research work in the industry -- and all that money I've paid -- went into screens that I now use just to display more whitespace.

I know it's supposed to help with touch screens but a) my laptop -- like most laptops currently in use -- doesn't have one and b) this isn't 1997 anymore, UI toolkits today make it trivial to adjust element sizes and paddings so that they're appropriate to whatever pointing device is currently in use.

1 comments

Which version of ICQ are you referring to? I was running ICQ on a 640x480 monitor back then and i remember it having a very compact window[0] which i always had it visible.

[0] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjOHmkFVAAUPzx6.jpg

It's been so long I really can't recall anymore. (Edit: but just like you, I do remember that I had the ICQ window visible at pretty much all times, and I could comfortably fit an Emacs window, the contact window a chat window on my desktop's 1024x768 screen.)

That being said, the window in that screenshot is about 200 x 320 px. It would have taken about a third of the horizontal space of the screen, and about 2/3rds of the vertical space of a 640x480 screen. It was certainly usable -- way, way more usable than Skype on a full HD monitor today -- but lots of stuff was claustrophobic in 640x480.

(Then again, most modern apps are practically unusable if you resize their window to 640x480...)

Sadly Skype and similar programs tend to take more physical space on my monitor than ICQ (and MSN Messenger, especially the original versions like the one included in Windows XP) ever did :-/
The latest version of ICQ was huge (think Windows XP skin), at this point I started using the QIP alternative client which was even more compact than the first version of the original client. When everybody started using Miranda, Pidgin file transfer pretty much broke due to client incompatibility. That was a sad moment, they had a nice product but stopped listening to the users.