[Rochus]

I think most developers get along pretty well with only the parts available under LGPL; that's not the issue. It's more of an issue that the The Company only represents a fraction of the commit log but even though sells commercial licences of work done by other companies. I'm sure more companies would contribute to Qt if there wasn't this dual licence nuisance and they weren't forec to sign a contributor licence agreement which puts The Company in charge of their work.

[slavik81]

Commits by employer, for reference: https://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-stats/current/qt5.employer.r...

[Rochus]

Ok, a bit more than last year. One should also analyze what parts were commited. There is a significant difference in the commits by company to the core framework and the new 3D tools and other parts that The Company wants to make money with.

[slavik81]

The stats for qtbase are pretty similar. I suppose I might as well link the full page for folks: https://macieira.org/~thiago/qt-stats/current/

[Rochus]

Thanks. It was quite different when I looked at it a year ago. Maybe the new activity is because of Qt 6.