|
|
|
|
|
by swalladge
2255 days ago
|
|
> Wouldn't everyone be better off if that language was Rust itself, and people who don't want to write that "modern code" ... don't? Agreed. The author's whole argument of not wanting "having to make these superficial changes again and again" doesn't make sense. There isn't any requirement for all code to follow the latest and greatest idioms. Rust guarantees backwards compatibility, and the author even acknowledges that in the article. It would be pretty sad if the reason for no new features or syntax in Rust was due to programmers not wanting to feel like their code was no longer idiomatic. |
|
I gave up on EmberJS around the same time because I only got a five hour chunk of time every couple of weeks and they were making semantic changes so frequently then that it felt like I spent half of my time upgrading my code to work with the changes. It ended up being a major factor in killing that project for me and I’m just now getting back to it.