[segfaultbuserr]

It's unusual that x86 and Linux, which are generally not considered to be reliably and robust under an extreme environment, are used here. But since it's developed by SpaceX, it makes sense - move fast and break things, use off-the-shelf commercial systems as the basis to reduce costs.

Anyway, I think it should be more interesting to compare it with a modern rocket that uses a more specialized computer system, VxWorks comes to mind.

[Cthulhu_]

It's a risk assessment tbh; if they can put in more redundancy instead of fault-tolerant hardware at a fraction of the cost then it'll be cheaper for them.

I mean compare it with mainframes vs cloud computing; with the latter, you use off-the-shelf hardware and build your software in such a way that you will randomly lose machines, BUT because cloud computing you'll automatically spin up a new machine in that case.