| Let's assume cars kill N people a month, and the next pandemic kill N-1 old people a month and cancer kills N-2 people a month. We do nothing until we solve the cars?
What if it kills N-1 children we still do nothing? I do not see the argument that the resources should go to cars, if you want to solve car accidents you can do it for free, I have the secrets here: - don't give a diving license that easy. have decent tests - if you are caught drunk you should never drive again - if you are caught looking at a phone screen your license is gone for 10 years - if you are speeding your license is gone for 10 years - test the cars every 2 years to check they are safe and not polluting - analyze the crashes find the causes and address them, if speeding is the issue find a way to enforce speed limits. Do you have any evidence that if the lockdown did not have happened more lives would have been saved? Ironically probably less people died in car accidents so you need to find some domain where the number of deaths increased more then the lives saved, |