[throwaway_pdp09]

I think that is being pedantic. No-one's going to misunderstand what the intended idempotency of GET is supposed to be.

[wlll]

This may tip the pedantry scale too far, but the comment you are replying to is in reply to a comment that suggests confusion over the idempotency of GET.

I'm not suggesting that it's named wrong or anything like that, this is just about your comment.