|
|
|
|
|
by pjschlic
2257 days ago
|
|
When you say 'as long as the end user is not financially benefitting' - is the end user the lab conducting the test? You said in an earlier comment that the reimbursement for testing is too low to justify buying expensive equipment. You are also proposing to charge half the reimbursed rate for it to run on someone else's equipment. Are the current equipment owners expected to donate this crucial equipment, because if they are the bottleneck, shouldn't they be the ones compensated to encourage more equipment to be made available? |
|
The current equipment owners are already the clinical laboratories. It is unused capacity for them. Other owners are sequencing service providers. The full cost of running an end-to-end Sanger reaction as a provided service is $2-$6, so at the $50 reimbursement price, the laboratories will still be incentivized.