Thanks. That's very interesting he sent it to more than 20 people, though I haven't seen that reported on with official sources claiming so yet, maybe I missed something.
I don't really care what HASC has to say about anything. They're a bunch of political hacks. From their own letter: "While Captain Crozier clearly went outside the chain of command, " -- they don't even understand this is a mortal sin in the Navy. You don't go outside your chain of command.
The other has been widely reported, this CNN article has quotes from SECNAV.
> they don't even understand this is a mortal sin in the Navy. You don't go outside your chain of command.
When the captain made the decision to send the letter, wasn't he at that time superior to you in rank? But it's no problem for you to second guess his actions?
I guess I don't understand this chain of command business very well.
I don't work for the Captain. I've been retired for several years. He's not my superior and his rank doesn't matter. He made it a news item, and I'll second guess whatever I want to.
The Captain sent the letter to many people not in his chain of command, including someone who sent it to the newspaper (as he most likely expected would happen). That's not done in the Navy. Sending a letter like that to his superiors was perfectly acceptable. Getting it on the front cover of Navy Enquirer is not.
Yes, you are correct. You don't under this chain of command business at all.
There are formal and proper reporting channels for things like this. He went outside them, on purpose, to ensure the letter got leaked.