|
|
|
|
|
by nnq
2267 days ago
|
|
> could develop emergent qualia If we were to admit there really is such thing as "qualia", there's not reason you wouldn't ask the same question about non-biological software or hardware systems... electronic hardware or biological hardware can have same computational qualities. But since OBJECTIVELY there's no such things as qualia (the concept only exist SUBJECTIVELY), it could only exist by definition for "a person/subject" eg., in this context, a neural network large and complex enough to get close to a human-like intelligence level! A dragonfly nervous system is probably simpler than some of the the largest artificial neural networks models... |
|
Going this route, we'd have to say that if you wrote a program that perfectly simulated the human brain, you've built a conscious system running on transistors.
It also means that if you built a RISC-V processor based on a large number of neurons (say, as many as are in a human brain), you haven't built a conscious system, despite that it's neuron-based.
I'm ignoring the obvious problems with building a RISC-V using neurons; they strike me as incidental detail, for our purposes here.